#VincentFusca #QAnon #JFKJrLives
Vincent Fusca, whom we are told to believe is JFK Jr working with the QAnon team and President Trump to take down the deep state, was mingling with conservative heavy weights like Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Rudy Giuliani, George Papadopoulos, Roger Stone and Anthony Scaramucci at the American Priority Conference (APC) held December 6-8. 2018 in Washington DC.

A photograph of Fusca was captured by none other than Dustin Nemos. Nemos was removed as a speaker when the QAnon topic was deleted from the agenda at the request of many Trump supporters, but he attended the event with his expenses paid by the APC.

The Vincent Fusca/JFK Jr hoax has hundreds of thousands of followers, and YouTube channels that promote the conspiracy garner far more views than those promoting only QAnon. It can be safely said that those close to the Trump campaign and the White House staff are fully aware of the confused identity of Fusca.
Yet Fusca strolled among them in Washington without the matter being publicly addressed. Nemos claims he obtained Fusca’s business card, but apparently never asked him directly if he was aware that he was at the center of a conspiracy about JFK Jr. Seemingly, none of the key conservative figures present at the event took the initiative either.

Given that Fusca is very active in the Trump campaign, having been seated behind President Trump at a number of his rallies, it can no longer be left unsaid that at a minimum, the White House is complicit not only in the QAnon conspiracy but in the JFR Jr. hoax as well.

American Policy Conference Agenda

Vincent Fusca account on Twitter belongs to Green Party candidate

Jennifer Mac original video

Dustin Nemos original video

17 U.S. Code § 107 – Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use
Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—
the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
the nature of the copyrighted work;
the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.
(Pub. L. 94–553, title I, § 101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2546; Pub. L. 101–650, title VI, § 607, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5132; Pub. L. 102–492, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3145.)

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *